Although it is surely true that some are natural bad actors, experience demonstrates that prosecutors are strongly influenced to disregard and minimize rights by the culture that surrounds them.
The Netflix 10-part documentary, "Making A Murderer," has cast a spotlight on the tactics used by the Manitowoc and Calumet County Sheriffs, the Wisconsin Department of Justice Div. Kratz's conduct especially galling is that he had to know he was breaching both ethical rules governing pre-trial publicity and special rules which expect an even higher duty of prosecutors in criminal cases. television film review, Lorrie Moore cuts straight to the cultural background against which Steven Avery was convicted first, of rape, and when exonerated of that charge, of murder, and his nephew, Brendan Dassey, was convicted of rape and murder.
of Criminal Investigation and prosecutor Ken Kratz that reminds one of turning on a light and seeing roaches scramble for cover. These tactics worked in neighboring Outagamie County (Appleton) where Ken Hudson was convicted of murdering a jogger with a knife purchased a day later by police. Of all the shockers in the film , the most disturbing was Calumet County District Attorney Ken Kratz's press conference on March 2, 2006. "The entire [Avery] family is socially accused: outsiders, troublemakers, feisty, and a little dim.
An investigator ostensibly on Brendan’s defense team speaks openly of his distaste for the Avery family tree and says, 'Someone said to me we need to end the gene pool here.'” The Shame of Wisconsin Cato’s Tim Lynch and Shawn Armbrust of the Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project explore the many troubling unanswered questions that have turned this mundane murder case into a searing indictment of America’s flawed justice system. Another Brooklyn case bites the dust, but only after a quarter century of prosecutors hiding the evidence Ruddy Quezada sought to win a new trial. Quezada, but by the police and prosecutors who went after him. Most death row exonerations can be traced to prosecutor misconduct. State supreme courts, who bear the ultimate responsibility for the conduct they will accept from attorneys, have stood by like indulgent parents, tolerating outrageous behavior and even ruling that others must too. Corrupt Winnebago County, WI prosecutor Joe Paulus has been to prison and released, living on the balmy Gulf Coast and enjoying life.
Worse, the prosecutor responsible for the misconduct remains in office. Back in his heyday, Mark Price was one of at least 22 people against whom Paulus either inflated or fabricated charges designed to push his own career forward.
Only when the victim was caught selling cocaine did the prosecutor stop believing her, and join the defense in a motion to vacate the conviction.
Mark Weiner’s freedom did not come about because the system worked. a basketball star at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, was shot to death in his car in 1993, police zeroed in on Tyrone Hood because his fingerprint was found in trash left in the victim's car, and he lived near the school.
He finds the case against Tyrone Hood to be Crime Fiction.. Mike Ames for following the rules and telling the truth. They made arrests in more than half of the fires they said were arson. They conducted shoddy, biased investigations that led to false arson findings, and the arrests of innocent people for crimes that never happened in the first place. Orleans Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro didn’t stop with a concession that Ronald Bodenheimer and another former prosecutor, Harold “Tookie” Gilbert Jr., deliberately hid a detailed police report in the case in two separate trials. is about a murder conviction and death sentence that unraveled under the force of the truth.
There is one detective in Tacoma, WA who refused to reshape evidence (lie under oath) to help prosecutors convict a woman of crimes they could not prove -- most likely because she did not commit them. It is a case about state prosecutors getting caught hiding exculpatory evidence, and getting scolded for it by the federal courts, and then violating the federal court order sanctioning them by threatening a witness and spoiling the retrial of a man they helped to wrongly convict.
Though it’s common for court cases to end with defendants or their lawyers claiming bad behavior by prosecutors, actual legal findings of prosecutorial misconduct – decisions reached by a judge and entered into the record – are rare.